R2 Or Not? December 2018

Total responses: 31

Image 1

Overall Result:

R2: 77%

Not R2: 23%

Broken down by grader level:

Trainee Graders (8)

• R2: 50%
• Not R2: 50%

Qualified Graders (16)

• R2: 94%
• Not R2: 6%

ROG/L3 Graders (7)

• R2: 71%
• Not R2: 29%

Comments from those who said R2:

• IRMA? NVD? Between 9-10 o'clock
• MBH + IRMA + Reduplication Present in Image 1
• IRMA
• IRMA
• IRMA nasally

Comments from those who said NOT R2:

• R1
• looks more than R2

Image 2

Overall Result:

R2: 39%

Not R2: 61%

Broken down by grader level:

Trainee Graders (8)

• R2: 25%
• Not R2: 75%

Qualified Graders (16)

• R2: 56%
• Not R2: 44%

ROG/L3 Graders (7)

• R2: 14%
• Not R2: 86%

Comments from those who said R2:

• NOT Much MBH's in this Image to be Graded as R2 but Present of Peripheral IRMA's Makes Image2 an R2
• Same image as No 1
• This is the same eye as image 1.
• IRMA
• This is the nasal image from Image 1 so is R2. There is a small amount of IRMA nasally but not much. Image only could be R1

Comments from those who said NOT R2:

• R1

Image 3

Overall Result:

R2: 58%

Not R2: 42%

Broken down by grader level:

Trainee Graders (8)

• R2: 38%
• Not R2: 62%

Qualified Graders (16)

• R2: 63%
• Not R2: 37%

ROG/L3 Graders (7)

• R2: 71%
• Not R2: 29%

Comments from those who said R2:

• This Image boarders with R2 in respect of MBH but Present of Patches of IRMA Makes it R2.
• MBH
• IRMA

Comments from those who said NOT R2:

• Possibly not R2. Not enough larger haemorrhages to meet MBH and unable to see any other definite R2 features
• r2m1
• look like irma on some images, potential to be R2-R3 M1