R2 or Not? August 2018

Total: 39 responses

Image 1

Overall Result:

R2: 82%

Not R2: 18%

Broken down by grader level:

Trainee Graders (7)

• R2: 71%  
• Not R2 29%

Qualified Graders (20)

• R2: 90%  
• Not R2: 10%

ROG/L3 Graders (12)

• R2: 75%
• Not R2 25%  

Comments from those who said R2:

• Definitely R2
• Looks like quite a heavy R2
• it's difficult to be precise due to the fact that we are unable to enhance

Comments from those who said NOT R2:

• None recorded

Image 2

Overall Result:

R2: 92%

Not R2: 8%

Broken down by grader level:

Trainee Graders (7)

• R2: 100%  
• Not R2 0%

Qualified Graders (20)

• R2 90%
• Not R2: 10%

ROG/L3 Graders (12)

• R2: 92%
• Not R2  8%

Comments from those who said R2:

• Multiple blot Haems and IRMA
• It looks like the same retina as image 1 only moved across slightly
• Seeing that it's the same eye as the 1st question then has to be R2 also
• here again it would be good if we could enhance the images to form a better opinion

Comments from those who said NOT R2:

None recorded

Image 3

Overall Result:

R2: 85%

Not R2: 15%

Broken down by grader level:

Trainee Graders (7)

• R2: 57%
• Not R2: 43%

Qualified Graders (20)

• R2: 85%
• Not R2: 15%  

ROG/L3 Graders (12)

• R2: 100%
• Not R2 0%

Comments from those who said R2:

• Suspicious vascular abnormality 3DD superior (slightly temporal) to fovea - could be big loop, reduplication and a longs shot of NVE but happy to label as R2 on balance (ROG)

Comments from those who said NOT R2:

None recorded