R2 or Not? March 2018

Total: 52 responses

Image 1

Overall Result:

R2: 38%

Not R2: 62%

Broken down by grader level:

Trainee Graders (9)

• R2: 55%  
• Not R2 45%

Qualified Graders (31)

• R2: 23%  
• Not R2: 77%

ROG/L3 Graders (12)

• R2: 25%
• Not R2 75%  

Comments from those who said R2:

• No comments

Comments from those who said NOT R2:

• Not enough definite pathology to justify R2
• Possibly M1 though

Image 2

Overall Result:

R2: 40%

Not R2: 60%

Broken down by grader level:

Trainee Graders (9)

• R2: 56%
• Not R2: 48%

Qualified Graders (31)

• R2 60%
• Not R2: 40%

ROG/L3 Graders (12)

• R2: 50%
• Not R2 50%

Comments from those who said R2:

• Image 2 and image 3 are the same eye, so on that basis Image 2 has to be graded R2

Comments from those who said NOT R2:

• Not R2 but referable for M1

Image 3

Overall Result:

R2: 94%

Not R2: 6%

Broken down by grader level:

Trainee Graders (9)

• R2: 89%
• Not R2: 11%

Qualified Graders (31)

• R2: 93%
• Not R2: 7%  

ROG/L3 Graders (12)

• R2: 100%
• Not R2 0%

Comments from those who said R2:

• Minimum of R2, possible early NVD
• IRMA nasal
• R2 and M1
• I would prefer to see 3 different images rather than 2 of the same eye for image 2 and 3. Both have visible IRMAs in either nasal or macular view. But if the image 2 didn't show the IRMA it would grade as R1 even though the same eye would grade R2 in real life due to IRMA in nasal view.
• IRMA confirmed by presence of CWS

Comments from those who said NOT R2:

No comments recorded