R2 or Not? October 2017

Total: 37 responses

Image 1

Overall Result:

R2: 81%

Not R2: 19%

Broken down by grader level:

Trainee Graders (2)

• R2: 100%
• Not R2: 0%

Qualified Graders (29)

• R2: 86%
• Not R2: 14%

ROG/L3 Graders (6)

• R2: 50 %
• Not R2: 50%

Comments from those who said R2:

• irma
• IRMA visible in both colour and red free images
• few IRMAs
• IRMA

Comments from those who said NOT R2:

• Would query small area of NVD, but difficult to tell without past images
• I would recall in 6/12
• Likely NVD

Image 2

Overall Result:

R2: 89%

Not R2: 11%

Broken down by grader level:

Trainee Graders (2)

• R2: 50%
• Not R2: 50%

Qualified Graders (29)

• R2: 93%
• Not R2: 7%

ROG/L3 Graders (6)

• R2: 83%
• Not R2: 17%

Comments from those who said R2:

• there are some suspicious vessels on the upper rim of the image
• IRMAs only
• Borderline R3A possible NVE
• irma
• You see AV-nipping and restriction in blood flow which encourage IRMA type blood vessels. Visible in colour and red free images
• Irma
• Possible R3 with ?NVE

Comments from those who said NOT R2:

• NVE
• Hypertension, BRVO

Image 3

Overall Result:

R2: 73%

Not R2: 27%

Broken down by grader level:

Trainee Graders (2)

• R2: 50%
• Not R2: 50%

Qualified Graders (29)

• R2: 76%
• Not R2: 24%

ROG/L3 Graders (6)

• R2: 67%
• Not R2: 33%

Comments from those who said R2:

• MBH, R2 if on all quadrants
• enough haemorrhages can be seen
• mbh

Comments from those who said NOT R2:

(None)